The backlash continues to build over President Bush’s illegal wiretap authorizations. I just hope that he isn’t allowed to wriggle out of responsibility for his poor choice. The Drudge Report helpfully reminded us Tuesday after the original New York Times article ran that Presidents Carter and Clinton also issues similar authorizations by executive order as if to mitigate the blame by spreading it around to some Democrats. Well, that just doesn’t cut it for me. I don’t know the circumstances of Clinton’s EOs, nor did Drudge expound of the details of their scope, calling them “similar” to Bush’s. If they are in fact similar then I am equally appalled with Clinton. But the point is Bush is the president now and he needs to be held responsible.
Now we find out that last month President Bush summoned the publish and executive editor of the Times to the Oval Office to discourage them from running the piece, after a year of additional investigation to ensure the story was accurate. What hubris, but that is par for the course. The president was desperate to avoid the at last persuasive evidence of his law breaking.
I am disgusted by Bush’s utter contempt for the rule of law and for the constitution that he claims to value so highly and swore to protect. He has done nothing to fulfill his obligation to defend the constitution against fear, overreaction, and power grabs.

